| [link] Ok, so I'm gonna do what the other person did and comment on your gallery as a whole. It seems everything in your gallery is just swirling around in a 3d program with either one color or a collection of colors. Its all very plain and very similar. I have seen a very diverse fractal pieces so it isn't because of the form of art you decide to go for. You could try different color schemes, maybe integrate your abstract approach. It seems everything you do is connected to itself, there aren't different pieces. Everything you do is very simple too, maybe you could try more intricate designs. Maybe you should try looking at other fractal art and see if you get some inspiration. Its really hard to comment on fractal art constructively because it doesn't seem to follow many rules, I hope that helped. |
| [link] and they made me think a lot... I love the fractal community here to pieces. It's one of the friendliest and nicest communities here. We've so many passionate artists and software developers in this community and both groups contribute a lot to the community. We've people who make tutorials, write articles, an avesome CV, a lot of groups and there are always great support to get here. But I also want to learn how to improve my works. I learn new techniques, get new parameters and advice in the shack, but I'm talking about critiques. I love to get comments, regardless of how long they are. But to be honest, even I know that you fractal artists are the most easy going, humble persons I've met, still I don't dare to critique a piece. Yes you read right. I'm a pansy! A coward! And a hypocrite. I want crits, but don't offer any. I've got awesome critiques, like this one, from =lecristal [link] even with an example: [link] And I love this comment from Dece: [link] |
| Critique by ~Alphaandabrush Dec 20, 2011, 4:16:03 PM Hmm... I know a small bit about Fractals, and I understand they can be quite difficult. But I truly can't see much in this Fractal at all. It looks like you were trying to Apophysis and stretched the lines around and twisted them. I myself don't claim to know much about Fractals, but if this is your first fractal, it's an okay start, if your truly wanting to better yourself this is a decent start. I'm sorry but this just did not have much of an impact on me whatsoever, and the name certainly escapes me and I only saw this by checking new deviations to Critique. [link] |
| Critique by ~enogs-of-stewley 1 hour, 18 minutes ago There is no one thing that makes this work stand out for me. It is as a whole eye-catching and the colours work well but it is the shape the folded cloth look that I find particularly pleasing. I did wonder what other background colours would look like but I suspect black is the best for this image. I had thought that post work edit might find some more in the image perhaps a little clarify in something like Paint Shop Pro might bring out a little more of what is clearly there failing that perhaps with contrast, brightness and unsharp mask might also find a little more but all in all it is a fine piece of work. 0 out of 0 deviants thought this was fair. 1 Reply |
| Critique by ~enogs-of-stewley 1 day, 18 hours ago Like the colouring on this one the red and gold go together so well and the fade into the distance It has the appearance of some thing alive. The image is is a cohesive whole and works on all levels. Again I would like to see the back ground colour changed in several copies of the same fractal. I believe each new colour may change the essence image and give the viewer a new idea of what the fractal could represent. On the whole the image is fine and a pleasure to to look at and I will add it to my favorites. [link] |
| [link] Critique by ~gerardnienhuis You've got some great works of art here, and I'm happy I did find these... this one is really working for me: the colors are great, and the black background helps to add to the bright spots. the composition with the inside of the ball in green and yellow really adds to the picture ... I'm interested to see more of these. I'm not happy with the pink outside, but that's because I'm not a pink person... bright orange, as you've used in other pieces you posted here in DA work better for me.. I'm hoping you'll add some more like these with other colors, more yellow and perhaps some orange and less pink? If not, it's OK too... it's your work and it's great without any changes. Compliments, I'm impressed. I hope to see a lot more of these... if you have, plz post here |
| [link] Critique by ~gerardnienhuis this 1 I do like a lot: strong colors, great shape and composition. Interesting how the left black merges into the black of the background: this 1 deserves to be printed on a big canvas (10 x 10 meters wide) and put in a big white hall.. marble, I'd say. and then, you will only have to see this big work of art.. I surely hope 1 day it will happen like this. The colors are also great to follow. I keep looking at it, and the great line above is coming back in the left swirl.. This makes it even more interesting and makes it very interesting... only puzzeling thing is the gray lines in the center of your work.. in the middle of the bright red part there are some strange gray lines.. for me, they don't work and they should be made a different color.. perhpas yellow, or even bright green.. but not gray.. they keep your work lesser then it could be.. without the gray and perhaps with an other color, but the same pattern, it would have been perfect.. but now, it's nearly perfect for me.. But then, others might find it interesting and keep looking at the perfect lines of gray.. I don't believe a work of art always needs to be perfeect: a little bit of imperfection is what makes it better.. you'll be forced to wonder, if it's intended to be imperfect, or it is just that lillte peace of imperfection that makes you look at it again and again.. and that way it helps your work in getting more attention. Compliments with your work, i do hope to see more of this . ... and who knows? Perhaps some gallery will pick up the idea and make them just what they are already: big works of art ! |
| ~gerardnienhuis so, I told you before, but I have to repeat this when I see your work: it's interesting to imagine a gallery full of your work, like 2 x 2 meters wide or bigger... 3 x 3 meters wide, 4 x 4 meters ?... I'd strongly suggest you find a way to collect some money (try crowd funding) and find software, perhaps hardware, to make bigger and sharper images and make some examples to show to some gallery owners.. I'm sure they'd sell and get attention of a lot of people. Would be a shame if they would only be seen here: your work is worth a bigger stage ! |
| Critique by ~SadieandMaddie Let me just say that is beautiful work. 1.The colors are beautiful. 2.The shape of this is fasinating. 3Beautiful work 4.great picture of it!!! 5.The white backround is great because it makes the object stand out!!!! now for the cons. there are NO cons. I think you should stick with what your doing I hope to see more art from you!!!!!!!!Once again your a really good artist!!I think I will watch you!(defintly I'll watch you!)love this work it's hard to take your eyes off the details!Love this soooo much!!!!!sorry that I repeat myself I need 5 more words to do!!!!!and I'm done Peace [link] |